DesignSpark Reviews

Before you order your circuit boards, visit our PCB Price Calculator. You can enter the size, layers, and quantity of your board and get prices from 26 different PCB manufacturers instantly.

Visit the download page for DesignSpark PCB.

There are 3 reviews with an average rating of 4.  

To ensure high-quality reviews and ratings, we moderate every review. To write a review, you must include a valid e-mail address. We will not post your e-mail address, and we will never give it to anyone else or use it to spam you. We might send you an e-mail to verify the information in your review.

Submit your review

Create your own review

Average rating:  
 3 reviews
by Kevin Craske on DesignSpark PCB
Ticks so many boxes

My criteria is
1. Proven capability. This software is a spin off from a well established company. Not only that, it has been developed and supported by RS Components for a long time. It is regularly updated and bugs fixed.
2. No limitations. Absolutely no limits in size, number of components, pins. You name it.
3. Good parts library. Has a native large parts library but you can also use another free application to search for other components. If they are not there you can use a very easy to use wizard to design it yourself or request a part to be made. You can then easily use the design in DesignSpark. You can design within the package as well.
4. Produces industry standard Gerber files. Does just this so you can chose who you have fabricate your creation.
5. Support. Online tutorials and a forum.
6. Easy to use. No comprehensive application such as this is so easy that you can just install and know everything about it but this is no harder than some I have tried and easier than others.
7. Price. Free, yes free. True RS would like you to order components from them and they make it easy to do so but you have absolutely no obligation
A complete schematic capture, PCB design auto route, Gerber file creation package with other free applications to help.
If there is a down side, no simulation.
No I do not work for nor never have worked for the RS. Just a user that cannot see why I would ever pay for anything else or use anything else.

by Gregory on DesignSpark PCB
Good for mamual work.

I have to create all components myself. I did not fined the way to view Gerber files. And at the end - Auto-routing is horrible - and I do not wont to do it manually! - Wasted so much time.

by David Taylor on DesignSpark PCB
Very capable EDA software

Prior to using DesignSpark I had not seen much in the way of useful information on the web. Reading what was out there suggested it may not have been worth the effort to kick the tires. A complete shame since it is actually very well designed and quite capable once you learn your way around the application. I managed to design a rather dense 4-layer PCB with 0.5 mm pitch QFNs and 6 mil trace/spacing without encountering any serious issues.

DesignSpark is actually in quite good company since it is a custom version of Number One Systems' Easy-PC PCB sponsored by RS Components. Similarly, Advanced Circuits in Phoenix Arizona has PCB Artist which is based on an earlier version of Easy-PC PCB as best I can tell. All very capable, but largely non-interoperable by design 🙁

Having used Eagle for previous designs, the first thing that becomes apparent is that DS is a relatively modern application without too many unexpected surprises. Definitely not a shiny MS Ribbon UI application, but at least a respectable mid 2000's toolbar based UI design. Navigation is very logical as is round trips back and forth between schematics and PCB layout.

There are some areas that need improvement and were a major hurdle in the beginning. First and foremost is the component designer. Understanding the component model and "design technology" approach takes a bit to wrap your head around since it is not well documented IMHO. The measuring tool is also very limited and frustrating in general. Positioning pads and shapes is near impossible until you discover the wonderful "=" key and " +" sequences that let you enter absolute or relative coordinates. A little bit of practice and the component design process is not too bad compared to other tools. Even Altium is less than stellar in this area and it costs $10K per seat!

After a couple of months of using DesignSpark I know most of its quirks and how to work around them with ease. The only real limitation without a clean workaround is creating custom land patterns which have special solder paste requirements (e.g. windowing or home base pattern). Fine pitch components can also be a challenging since DesignSpark lacks the knobs for controlling solder mask on a per component basis. Still workable, just a some tradeoffs I would prefer not to have to make.

One final bright spot is that DesignSpark is actually being maintained and improved! RS Components is continuing to invest in DesignSpark and is releasing new major versions and bug fix releases. Support has even been very receptive to my bug reports and is sending them to the product manager! Try to get that level of service with Altium 😉

I hope someone finds this review helpful and gives DesignSpark a try. I rarely write reviews, but feel that DesignSpark deserves more positive attention than it has been receiving.